Month: March 2025

Approaches for Teaching Media Literacy

Approaches for Teaching Media Literacy

This text summarises the results of the focus rounds implemented at the project’s start. The Fundacja PSP (Poland) team analysed and transferred the provided feedback into readable form.

Andragogical Approaches for Teaching Media Literacy and Digital Skills to Adults 55+

Teaching older adults media literacy and digital skills requires a practical, interactive, and flexible pedagogical approach. Educators must consider seniors’ cognitive and emotional needs and ensure that learning is accessible, confidence-building, and relevant to real-life situations. Various countries emphasize hands-on learning, structured guidance, and supportive environments to foster practical digital literacy.

1. Effective Teaching Methods and Approaches

Country-Based Overview

  • Poland (PSP & IFAE): The most effective methods include Kolb’s experiential learning cycle, learning-by-doing, and creating a friendly, patient atmosphere. A mix of theory and practice, supported by interactive discussions and small-group work, helps seniors engage meaningfully.
  • Turkey: Seniors benefit most from demonstration-based learning, interactive group work, and discovery-based methods. Educators must address their fear of making mistakes by providing step-by-step guidance and practical examples.
  • Italy: Experience-based learning is preferred, with an emphasis on cooperative learning, micro-objectives, and hands-on practice. Teaching should focus on transformative learning, helping seniors reflect on and apply new skills in daily life.
  • Austria: Learning approaches must be tailored to individual needs while emphasizing multimodal and intergenerational learning. Confidence-building is key, as many older adults fear failure and embarrassment when engaging with digital tools.

Best Practices Across Countries
  • Hands-on learning through trial and error.
  • Small-group discussions and cooperative learning to foster peer support.
  • Blended learning approaches combining face-to-face training with online reinforcement.
  • Experiential methods to ensure relevance to daily life.
  • Encouraging mistake-making as part of the learning process.

2. Preferred Learning Methods for Older Adults

Country-Based Overview

  • Poland (PSP & IFAE): Seniors prefer one-on-one instruction, group work, and trial-and-error learning. Visual and structured learning materials (such as blackboards, tables, and printed notes) help reinforce concepts.
  • Turkey: Hands-on, interactive methods are preferred, including peer-to-peer learning and video-based instruction. Seniors also benefit from structured learning goals to stay motivated.
  • Italy: Face-to-face learning, practical exercises, and video tutorials are the most effective. Seniors favour cooperation over individualism and need structured, goal-oriented teaching.
  • Austria: Confidence-building techniques and intergenerational learning are crucial in keeping seniors engaged.

Best Practices Across Countries
  • Group learning and peer-to-peer support foster collaboration.
  • Face-to-face teaching is essential for building trust.
  • Simple and clear instructions make learning accessible.
  • Practical tasks and real-life applications boost motivation.
  • Structured lessons with well-defined goals help maintain engagement.

3. Creating Accessible Learning Materials

Country-Based Overview

  • Poland (PSP & IFAE): Learning materials should be clear, visually accessible, and well-structured. Printed notes, booklets, and handouts should accompany lessons. Seniors prefer no formal grading, tests, or learning for self-development rather than certification.
  • Turkey: Printouts, videos, and slides are preferred. Learning materials should be designed for repetition and gradual skill-building.
  • Italy: Materials must meet accessibility standards (e.g., Verdana font size 14+, line spacing 1.5+). Short sentences and clear explanations reduce cognitive overload.
  • Austria: Various media formats, including interactive elements, printed resources, and hands-on workshops, are recommended.

Best Practices Across Countries
  • Use large fonts and high-contrast materials for readability.
  • Provide printed resources (booklets, summary sheets) for reference.
  • Keep explanations short and clear to aid comprehension.
  • Ensure accessibility standards for digital content.
  • Offer structured, progressive learning materials to build skills step by step.

4. Organising the Learning Process for Seniors

Country-Based Overview

  • Poland (PSP & IFAE): Short lessons (1–1.5 hours) with frequent breaks work best. Educators should ensure clear objectives, flexible lesson plans, and plenty of time for questions and discussions.
  • Turkey: Practical exercises should be repeated at home to reinforce learning. Group projects and intergenerational learning can increase engagement.
  • Italy: In-person sessions should focus on skill acquisition and social interaction, while online learning should reinforce concepts. Sessions should be limited to 45–60 minutes to prevent fatigue.
  • Austria: Confidence-building is essential; educators should encourage mistake-making as part of the learning process and use multimodal teaching approaches.

Best Practices Across Countries
  • Short, well-structured lessons with frequent breaks.
  • A combination of in-person and online learning is needed to reinforce skills.
  • Encouraging independent practice at home.
  • Providing social interaction opportunities to prevent isolation.
  • Building confidence and motivation by creating a supportive environment.

5. Addressing Challenges and Fears in Senior Learning

Common Challenges Across Countries

  • Technological barriers: Seniors struggle with complex interfaces, small fonts, and unfamiliar digital tools.
  • Fear of making mistakes: Many older adults hesitate to engage due to self-doubt and lack of confidence.
  • Memory and cognitive difficulties: Forgetfulness and slower information processing require repetition and simplified learning materials.
  • Social and cultural barriers: Some learners struggle with modern terminology or topics like multiculturalism or digital privacy.

Country-Based Overview

  • Poland (PSP & IFAE): Educators should provide active listening, personalized support, and clear communication. Engaging workshops help build confidence.
  • Turkey: Seniors need step-by-step guidance and supportive learning environments to reduce fear. Group-based learning helps prevent individual frustration.
  • Italy: Educators must be patient and encouraging, addressing fears of judgment and failure. Lessons should connect to personal experiences to make learning more relatable.
  • Austria: Seniors should be encouraged to embrace mistakes and view learning as a process. Intergenerational exchange can help build confidence.

Best Practices Across Countries
  • Create a safe, non-judgmental learning environment.
  • Encourage mistake-making as part of learning.
  • Provide step-by-step support to overcome technological barriers.
  • Use engaging and interactive teaching strategies.
  • Relate lessons to real-life experiences to increase motivation.

6. Enhancing Digital Education for Seniors

Country-Based Overview

  • Poland (PSP & IFAE): PowerPoint, Mentimeter, Moodle, and social media are useful, but many seniors struggle with basic tech navigation. Fake news awareness and web security are crucial components of digital education.
  • Turkey: Seniors prefer printed materials but are also interested in social media and digital apps. Gamification and interactive tasks can improve engagement.
  • Italy: Tools like Google Translate, WhatsApp, and Facebook are widely used, but clear learning objectives are essential to prevent frustration.
  • Austria: Multimedia resources and hands-on practice are key. AI-generated fake content is becoming harder to detect, requiring strong digital literacy training.

Best Practices Across Countries
  • Simplify digital interfaces and use large fonts/icons.
  • Teach cybersecurity and critical thinking skills.
  • Incorporate gamification and interactive tasks.
  • Use familiar platforms like Facebook and WhatsApp.
  • Provide continuous guidance and reinforcement exercises.

 

About the BonJour! Project

The spread of disinformation and misinformation poses risks to democracy, public health, and social cohesion, particularly affecting older adults who often lack adequate media literacy. The BonJour project aims to bridge this gap by enhancing media literacy, journalism skills, and digital competencies for people over 55, fostering their social activism, and reducing the generational digital divide through blended learning formats.
Project number:
2023-1-IT02-KA220-ADU-000160320
Webpage:
www.bonjour-project.eu/

 

Evaluation of the Survey Results on Dimension 5: Remembering

Evaluation of the Survey Results on Dimension 5: Remembering

This survey assesses the ability to remember information, which is the first and lowest level of Bloom’s Taxonomy – a framework for classifying educational learning objectives. Bloom’s Taxonomy consists of six levels: Remember, Understand, Apply, Analyse, Evaluate, and Create. Each level represents a step toward deeper learning and critical thinking.

At the “Remember” level, learners are expected to recall facts, concepts, and key information. This is essential for building knowledge and serves as the foundation for higher-order thinking. Our survey focuses on how well participants remember information after reading, specifically in three areas:

  • R5: Ability to recall key ideas from a text after reading.
  • R15: Ability to remember previously read information when needed.
  • R19: General recollection of what was learned in school.
Evaluation "Remember"
This is the graphic visualisation of the questions addressing “Remember” (From Bloom’s taxonomy).

Summary of Results

  1. R5 – Recalling Key Ideas After Reading

    • A large majority (24 out of 28 respondents) agreed or fully agreed that they can recall key ideas from a text.
    • Only 4 respondents were neutral, and none disagreed.
    • This suggests that most participants feel confident in remembering key ideas after reading.
  2. R15 – Remembering Information When Needed

    • 23 out of 28 respondents expressed agreement or full agreement with this statement.
    • 7 respondents were neutral, and only 1 showed slight disagreement.
    • This indicates that most participants can recall information when necessary, though some may find it challenging.
  3. R19 – Remembering School Learning

    • Responses were more varied, with only 3 people agreeing or fully agreeing that they remember much from school.
    • 13 respondents were neutral, while 15 expressed some level of disagreement.
    • This suggests that many people struggle to remember school content, possibly due to time passed or lack of relevance in daily life.

Key Insights

  • Respondents generally feel confident in recalling information immediately after reading and when needed.
  • Long-term memory of school learning appears weaker, with many either neutral or disagreeing.
  • No strong disagreement was recorded for short-term recall (R5 and R15), reinforcing the idea that reading helps with retention in the short term.

Diese Umfrage bewertet die Fähigkeit, sich an Informationen zu erinnern, was die erste und niedrigste Stufe der Bloom’schen Taxonomie ist – ein Rahmenwerk zur Klassifizierung von Bildungszielen. Bloom’s Taxonomie besteht aus sechs Stufen: Erinnern, Verstehen, Anwenden, Analysieren, Bewerten und Erstellen. Jede Stufe stellt einen Schritt zu tieferem Lernen und kritischem Denken dar.

Auf der “Erinnern”-Stufe wird von Lernenden erwartet, dass sie Fakten, Konzepte und Schlüsselinformationen abrufen können. Dies ist entscheidend für den Wissensaufbau und dient als Grundlage für höheres Denken. Unsere Umfrage konzentriert sich darauf, wie gut sich die Teilnehmenden nach dem Lesen an Informationen erinnern, insbesondere in drei Bereichen:

  • R5: Fähigkeit, nach dem Lesen eines Textes zentrale Ideen zu erinnern.
  • R15: Fähigkeit, sich bei Bedarf an zuvor gelesene Informationen zu erinnern.
  • R19: Allgemeine Erinnerung an in der Schule gelerntes Wissen.
Evaluation "Remember"
Dies ist die grafische Darstellung der Fragen zur Stufe “Erinnern” (nach Bloom’s Taxonomie).

Zusammenfassung der Ergebnisse

  1. R5 – Erinnern zentraler Ideen nach dem Lesen

    • Eine große Mehrheit (24 von 28 Teilnehmenden) stimmte zu oder stimmte vollständig zu, dass sie sich nach dem Lesen an zentrale Ideen erinnern können.
    • Nur 4 Teilnehmende waren neutral, und niemand widersprach.
    • Dies deutet darauf hin, dass die meisten Teilnehmenden sich nach dem Lesen sicher an zentrale Ideen erinnern können.
  2. R15 – Erinnern von Informationen bei Bedarf

    • 23 von 28 Teilnehmenden stimmten zu oder stimmten vollständig zu.
    • 7 Teilnehmende waren neutral, und nur 1 äußerte leichte Ablehnung.
    • Dies zeigt, dass die meisten Teilnehmenden sich bei Bedarf an Informationen erinnern können, obwohl einige dies als schwierig empfinden.
  3. R19 – Erinnern von Schulwissen

    • Die Antworten waren hier vielfältiger. Nur 3 Personen stimmten zu oder vollständig zu, dass sie sich an viel aus der Schule erinnern.
    • 13 Teilnehmende waren neutral, während 15 in gewissem Maße widersprachen.
    • Dies zeigt, dass viele Schwierigkeiten haben, sich an Schulwissen zu erinnern, möglicherweise aufgrund der Zeit, die vergangen ist, oder weil es im Alltag nicht relevant ist.

Zentrale Erkenntnisse

  • Die Teilnehmenden fühlen sich sicher darin, sich direkt nach dem Lesen und bei Bedarf an Informationen zu erinnern.
  • Die langfristige Erinnerung an Schulwissen erscheint schwächer, viele waren neutral oder stimmten nicht zu.
  • Keine starke Ablehnung wurde für das kurzfristige Erinnern (R5 und R15) verzeichnet, was darauf hinweist, dass das Lesen das Behalten von Informationen kurzfristig unterstützt.