In projects, we often use the term “Peer Review“. Unfortunately, peer review can mean different issues. Peer review is used to jointly develop documents as well as to review the quality of a document. The main differences involve the process to enhance a jointly developed document by adding content, comments, and suggestions. Another type focuses on evaluating the quality, content, document structure, and layout (including typos) of a document.
Different relevant items
These distinct approaches serve different purposes in the review process.
- Purpose
The purpose of a peer review to enhance a jointly developed document is to improve the content and structure of the document by adding content, comments, and suggestions. The purpose of a quality review of a document is to evaluate the content, document structure, and layout of the document to ensure that it is accurate, clear, and easy to read. - Audience
The audience for a review to enhance a jointly developed document is the authors of the document. The audience for a quality review of a document is typically the author of the document, but it can also be other stakeholders, such as editors, publishers, or readers. - Type of feedback
The feedback provided in a peer review to enhance a jointly developed document is typically more informal and open-ended. The feedback provided in a quality review of a document is typically more formal and structured. - Timeliness
Peer reviews to enhance a jointly developed document are typically conducted in a shorter timeframe than quality reviews of documents. This is because the goal of a peer review to enhance a jointly developed document is to improve the document before it is finalized, while the goal of a quality review of a document is to ensure that the document is of high quality before it is published or released.
Comparison table of peer review
Here is a table that summarizes the key differences between peer review to enhance a jointly developed document and quality review of a document:
| Feature | Peer Review to Enhance a Jointly Developed Document | Quality Review of a Document |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Improve the content and structure of the document | Evaluate the content, document structure, and layout of the document |
| Audience | Authors of the document | Author of the document, editors, publishers, or readers |
| Type of feedback | Informal and open-ended | Formal and structured |
| Timeliness | Shorter timeframe | Longer timeframe |
b
The term “Peer Review”